Opinion
June 20, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Groh, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).
We have also considered the contentions raised in the defendant's pro se supplemental brief and have found them to be devoid of merit. Mangano, J.P., Kooper, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.