From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1993
199 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court's refusal to give a missing witness charge with respect to the People's failure to call Officer Esposito to testify was proper. The People established that Officer Esposito's testimony would not have contradicted or added to that of the other witnesses, and therefore, would have been cumulative (see, People v Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126; People v Buckler, 39 N.Y.2d 895; People v Porter, 110 A.D.2d 662). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1993
199 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARRY TATE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 252

Citing Cases

People v. Pena

The defendant also contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for a missing witness charge…

People v. Moore

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred by refusing to give a missing-witness charge with…