From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tate

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2014
115 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-19

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Shammel TATE, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered March 18, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain alleged prosecutorial misconduct on summation is unpreserved for appellate review ( seeCPL 470.05[2]; People v. Faustin, 35 A.D.3d 499, 826 N.Y.S.2d 139), and, in any event, without merit.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS–RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tate

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2014
115 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Shammel TATE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 19, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 887
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1777