Opinion
May 26, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bourgeois, J.).
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and the arguments raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief, filed pursuant to leave granted by this court, and find them to be without merit. We agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.