From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tarantola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1992
187 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 9, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the mandatory surcharges imposed upon the defendant's conviction of burglary in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree are vacated.

We agree with the defendant that the court imposed mandatory surcharges upon the defendant's conviction of burglary in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in clear violation of Penal Law § 60.35 (2), which forbids the imposition of multiple surcharges upon the defendant's conviction of multiple crimes arising from the commission of a single act or through an act which "in itself constituted one of the crimes and * * * also was a material element of the other". The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree (felony murder), burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree arising from the death of one victim. He could receive only one mandatory surcharge with respect to those counts. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tarantola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1992
187 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Tarantola

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL TARANTOLA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Joshwall P.

Defendant's claim regarding the mandatory surcharges and crime victim assistance fee imposed is unpreserved…

People v. Flores

However, in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction, we reach defendant's contentions and find…