Opinion
April 24, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions of errors regarding the admission of certain testimony and the failure of the trial court to give limiting instructions were not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, the errors, if any, do not warrant reversal in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.