From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tanner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2004
10 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4122

September 23, 2004.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J., at suppression hearing; John E.H. Stackhouse, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 10, 2000, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record ( see People v. Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). The credible evidence, along with reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom ( see People v. Gonzalez, 91 NY2d 909) established that defendant was arrested on the basis of the observing officer's detailed description.

Defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender. Defendant did not establish that his predicate felony conviction was unconstitutionally obtained ( see People v. Harris, 61 NY2d 9). On the contrary, the record establishes that defendant, who had already served the agreed-upon sentence, validly waived his right to counsel at his 1990 sentencing proceeding ( see People v. Mims, 280 AD2d 262, lv denied 96 NY2d 832).


Summaries of

People v. Tanner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2004
10 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Tanner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD TANNER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
781 N.Y.S.2d 741

Citing Cases

People v. Christian

Again, of note was the fact that the officers were working together in a coordinated drug interdiction…