Opinion
November 13, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
It was not error for the court to admit into evidence testimony regarding the defendant's use of an alias. The probative value of such evidence outweighed its possible prejudicial effect (see, People v. Allweiss, 48 N.Y.2d 40; People v. Kay, 120 A.D.2d 615).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Eiber, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.