From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Swift

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 2000
272 A.D.2d 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 9, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel Sullivan, J.), rendered January 3, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 17 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Rafael Curbelo, for Respondent.

Barbara Zolot, for Defendant-Appellant.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., MAZZARELLI, ELLERIN, RUBIN, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the prosecutor's summation comment on defendant's opportunity to tailor his testimony as a result of hearing the other witnesses and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would conclude that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Portuondo v. Agard ( 529 U.S. 61, 120 S.Ct. 1119) is dispositive of the issues raised by defendant and that there is no basis upon which to reach a different result as a matter of State constitutional law.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Swift

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 2000
272 A.D.2d 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Swift

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JACOB SWIFT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 9, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 611

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

Were we to review defendant's claims, we would reject them. To the extent that the prosecutor's summation may…

People v. Stewart

Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal. The challenged portion of the People's…