From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Swersky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

May, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.


Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion.


I dissent upon the ground that it was error to charge that there were three accomplices only — Friedman, O'Brien and Mrs. Erlichman; that it was also error for the court to hold that Joseph Erlichman was not in law an accomplice; and that it was further error to refuse the request to charge that it was for the jury to determine whether Joseph Erlichman was or was not an accomplice. In my opinion, the question of his being an accomplice was one of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.


Summaries of

People v. Swersky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

People v. Swersky

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . MAX SWERSKY, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)