From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sutliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 17, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 17, 1991

Appeal from the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.).


On March 20, 1989, defendant entered a plea of guilty to fifth degree criminal sale of the controlled substance cocaine. He was sentenced as a predicate felon to a term of imprisonment of 2 1/2 to 5 years. On appeal, this court vacated defendant's sentence and remitted the matter to County Court because "defendant was not adequately informed of his right to challenge any statement regarding a predicate felony conviction as required by CPL 400.21" ( 168 A.D.2d 745, 746). Upon remittal, defendant controverted the validity of his previous felony conviction by alleging that it was procured in violation of his constitutional right to counsel. Despite defendant's request for a hearing and for the minutes of his previous plea allocutions, County Court sentenced defendant as a predicate felon to a prison term of 2 1/2 to 5 years. This appeal followed.

Defendant was convicted of three counts of third degree burglary on June 16, 1983.

Defendant contends that it was error to deny his request for a hearing on his challenge to the previous felony conviction. We agree. Defendant was entitled to a hearing (see, CPL 400.21; People v. Longboat, 154 A.D.2d 916; People v. Allen, 135 A.D.2d 1034, 1035). We reject the People's argument on appeal that County Court's plea colloquy satisfied the hearing requirement, particularly in view of defendant's request for the minutes of his previous plea allocution (see, People v. Gonzalez, 108 A.D.2d 622, 623-624; cf., People v. De Vorce, 115 A.D.2d 553, 554).

Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for a hearing and resentencing in accordance with CPL 400.21; and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Sutliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 17, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Sutliff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS J. SUTLIFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 875

Citing Cases

People v. Zeoli

As a result of this broad and explicit waiver (see, People v. Allen, 82 N.Y.2d 761, 763), which we also find…

People v. Ladd

Thus, defendant cannot be said to have made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to challenge his…