From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sutliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 13, 1990

Appeal from the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.).


The People concede that defendant was not adequately informed of his right to challenge any statement regarding a predicate felony conviction as required by CPL 400.21. Due to this failure to comply with the statutory procedures for determining second felony offender status, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted for resentencing (see, People v. Snyder, 105 A.D.2d 553).

Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sutliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Sutliff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS J. SUTLIFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)