Opinion
2017–05463 S.C.I. No. 420/17
08-08-2018
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Danzel SUMPTER, appellant.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Alice R.B. Cullina of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Christopher J. Blira–Koessler of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Alice R.B. Cullina of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Christopher J. Blira–Koessler of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., SHERI S. ROMAN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephanie Zaro, J.), imposed March 28, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Stanley, 99 A.D.3d 955, 951 N.Y.S.2d 909 ).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., ROMAN, COHEN, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.