From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sumpter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2016
48 N.Y.S.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

No. 571135/15.

11-14-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Romel SUMPTER, Defendant–Appellant.


Judgment of conviction (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered November 3, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 [1969] ; People v. Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013] ). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v. Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, n 1 [2015] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sumpter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2016
48 N.Y.S.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

People v. Sumpter

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Romel SUMPTER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2016

Citations

48 N.Y.S.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)