From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sumblin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 2003
1 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08864.

Submitted October 22, 2003.

November 24, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered September 18, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

David Goodman, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (David Steinberg of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, THOMAS A. ADAMS, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, ADAMS and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sumblin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 2003
1 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Sumblin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., Respondent, v. MATTHEW SUMBLIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 641