From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 10, 1989
148 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

March 10, 1989

Appeal from the Livingston County Court, Cicoria, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine, and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, after a joint trial with three codefendants, on eight counts of a nine-count indictment arising out of an escape from the Livingston County jail. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in declining to charge the jury that it could find that Richard Trathen, the main People's witness, was an accomplice and that, if Trathen was an accomplice, his testimony needed to be corroborated. We find no merit to this contention. The evidence at trial showed that Trathen had provided defendants with a map of the surrounding area before he became aware of defendants' planned escape. On these facts, there is no reasonable view of the evidence to support a conclusion that Trathen was an accomplice of defendants (CPL 60.22; see, People v. Tucker, 72 N.Y.2d 849). We have examined defendant's other contentions, and we find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 10, 1989
148 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD SULLIVAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 227

Citing Cases

People v. Neiva

Further, defendant was not denied a speedy trial nor was his sentence harsh or excessive. The remaining…

People v. Lowery

Memorandum: Defendant was tried, along with three codefendants, on charges arising out of an escape from the…