From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division
Jul 2, 2007
No. E041293 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 2, 2007)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HEIDI SULLIVAN, Defendant and Appellant. E041293 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Second Division July 2, 2007

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County No. FSB052974. Kenneth Barr, Judge. Affirmed.

Marilee Marshall, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

RAMIREZ, P.J.

On May 12, 2006, in case No. FSB052974, the District Attorney of San Bernardino County filed an information which alleged in counts one, two and three, violations of Penal Code section 422, criminal threats.

On May 15, 2006, defendant, represented by counsel pled guilty as charged. Thereafter, on July 5, 2006, defendant was committed to state prison for 16 months and in accordance with the negotiated disposition and the Vargas waiver, counts two and three (Pen. Code, § 422) were dismissed and defendant was awarded the appropriate custody credits.

People v. Vargas (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1653.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On October 9, 2005, the San Bernardino Police Department recorded the criminal threats that defendant made to a police officer of that department. Defendant stated that she had emptied her bank account, purchased a gun, and that she was going to the officer’s residence to kill him.

Defendant appealed, and upon her request this court appointed counsel to represent her. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which she has not done.

We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: McKINSTER, J., MILLER, J.


Summaries of

People v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division
Jul 2, 2007
No. E041293 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 2, 2007)
Case details for

People v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HEIDI SULLIVAN, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division

Date published: Jul 2, 2007

Citations

No. E041293 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 2, 2007)