From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Suggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1995
220 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without conducting an evidentiary hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926; People v. Zaia, 181 A.D.2d 931). Neither the defendant's bare assertions of innocence nor his vague and conclusory claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was sufficient to justify setting aside the plea of guilty (see, People v. Richardson, 214 A.D.2d 624; People v. Woodard, 208 A.D.2d 411; People v. Hall, 195 A.D.2d 521). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Suggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1995
220 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Suggs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERNEST SUGGS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 964

Citing Cases

People v. Suggs

March 30, 2010. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…

People v. Jefferson

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in…