From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sudhan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 2011
83 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2009-07622.

April 12, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered June 26, 2009, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (two counts), and conspiracy in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Gary Fidel and Edward D. Saslaw of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Cohen, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the accomplice's testimony was sufficiently corroborated ( see CPL 60.22; People v Reome, 15 NY3d 188, 194; People v Cortez, 81 AD3d 742).

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in its jury instruction for the conspiracy count is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Sudhan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 2011
83 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Sudhan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEWEL SUDHAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 2011

Citations

83 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 3094
920 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

People v. Powell

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution…

People v. Powell

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution…