Opinion
August 4, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
We find no basis to reconsider this court's earlier determination that the defendant had failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the jury's verdict of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree was repugnant to its verdict of not guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (see, People v Suarez, 99 A.D.2d 473, lv denied 62 N.Y.2d 654).
In addition, since the defendant failed to object to the charge to the jury, consideration of any alleged error of law therein is not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05) and the defendant's claim with respect to the charge does not warrant review in the interest of justice.
We have considered the defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.