From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stuewe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1984
103 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

July 13, 1984

Appeal from the Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's conviction of arson in the third degree was not against the weight of the evidence. The People established motive and opportunity to commit the crime and excluded any reasonable hypothesis that the fire was innocent in nature ( People v Feuerstein, 74 A.D.2d 853). The testimony of the People's expert witnesses did not impermissibly indicate that the fire was set intentionally ( People v. Grutz, 212 N.Y. 72, 82; People v Vincek, 75 A.D.2d 412, 416).

¶ The Trial Judge properly refused to admit in evidence the results of a polygraph examination ( People v. Leone, 25 N.Y.2d 511; People v. Hughes, 88 A.D.2d 17, 22, affd 59 N.Y.2d 523). Other issues raised have been examined and found to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Stuewe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1984
103 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Stuewe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DON H. STUEWE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1984

Citations

103 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
478 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

People v. Shedrick

The trial court properly rejected defendant's request for a hearing. The law in New York is well settled on…

Matter of Smith

Respondent's offer of proof consisted of representations that the polygraph test was administered to him at…