From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1994
201 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the People failed to prove the element of intent to cause death beyond a reasonable doubt is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). The testimony demonstrated that the defendant, knowing that the gun was loaded and cocked, pointed it at the victim's chest at close range and pulled the trigger. Thus, the record reveals no basis for disturbing the judgment of conviction (see, Matter of Gemeil S., 185 A.D.2d 325; People v. Underwood, 126 A.D.2d 584). Balletta, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1994
201 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Strong

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMEL STRONG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 735

Citing Cases

People v. Albornoz-Sinisterra

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution…