From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Strickland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 12, 1989

Appeal from the Jefferson County Court, Aylward, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for review the issue of the sufficiency of his plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662). Even were we to find that defendant's claim falls within the narrow exception to the preservation rule (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Bell, 47 N.Y.2d 839; People v Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740), a reversal would not be required. The court received an affirmative response to its inquiry of defendant whether he was entering a plea of guilty to avoid the risk of conviction of the more serious crime charged, and thus the plea was properly accepted (see, People v Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304).


Summaries of

People v. Strickland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD STRICKLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)