Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Super. Ct. No. 06F11375
HULL, J.While defendant was on searchable probation in another felony case, he was searched after a traffic stop in Siskiyou County on September 7, 2004, and 3.98 grams of methamphetamine, and paraphernalia, was found in his backpack.
As part of a bargain leading to the dismissal of other charges, defendant pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine in this case. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) On October 11, 2005, the trial court sentenced him to prison for the midterm of two years, but suspended execution of sentence and placed defendant on probation.
In December 2006, defendant’s probation supervision was transferred to Shasta County. On March 29, 2007, a petition to revoke probation was filed, alleging defendant never contacted the Shasta County probation authorities.
Defendant was eventually arrested, and on May 14, 2008, he admitted the allegation in the petition.
On July 24, 2008, the trial court revoked probation and ordered the previously suspended prison sentence to be executed. Defendant timely filed this appeal.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
Disposition
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: NICHOLSON, Acting P. J., ROBIE, J.