From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sticatto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 23, 2000.

December 12, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered September 19, 1996, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Peter W. Birkett, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Solomon Neubort, and Thomas S. Burka of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his challenges to the prosecutor's summation because he either failed to object, to seek curative instructions, or to move for a mistrial (see, People v. Rivera, 73 N.Y.2d 941; People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641). In any event, the prosecutor's comments made during summation did not exceed the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument (see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396).

There was no violation of CPL 310.10 (see, People v. Fernandez, 81 N.Y.2d 1023).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Sticatto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Sticatto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. AKIDO STICATTO, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 197

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

The failure to timely object renders the remaining stated claims of error unpreserved for appellate review…