Opinion
363620
12-28-2022
LC No. 13-003860-FC
James Robert Redford, Christopher P. Yates Judges
ORDER
Mark T. Boonstra, Presiding Judge
The motion to expand the record is DENIED.
The motion to remand is DENIED.
The delayed application for leave to appeal is DENIED because defendant has failed to establish that the trial court erred in denying the successive motion for relief from judgment. Because the alleged "new scientific evidence" was never presented to the trial court, it was not considered by the Court. This order does not preclude defendant from filing another successive motion for relief from judgment on a claim that the alleged "new scientific evidence" is "evidence that was not discovered before the first" motion for relief from judgment. MCR 6.502(G)(2).