From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sterling

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 12, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 152 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

16-259

03-12-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael STERLING, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Michael D. Stallman, J.), rendered October 25, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v. Alabama , 395 US 238 [1969] ). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v. Conceicao , 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Sterling

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 12, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 152 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Sterling

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Sterling…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Mar 12, 2020

Citations

66 Misc. 3d 152 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50345
125 N.Y.S.3d 830