From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stephens

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2013
108 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-2

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James STEPHENS, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Brian R. Pouliot of counsel), for respondent.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Brian R. Pouliot of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, FEINMAN, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), rendered October 14, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's claim that the court improperly imposed sentence without sufficient inquiry into the circumstances surrounding defendant's departure from a diversion program is unpreserved because he neither requested further inquiry nor moved to withdraw his plea ( see e.g. People v. Malaj, 69 A.D.3d 487, 894 N.Y.S.2d 31 [1st Dept. 2010], lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 776, 907 N.Y.S.2d 464, 933 N.E.2d 1057 [2010] ), and we decline to review in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that defendant's violation of the terms of the plea agreement was properly based upon a reliable letter from the program's intake director and defendant's own account of the events ( People v. Fiammegta, 14 N.Y.3d 90, 98, 896 N.Y.S.2d 735, 923 N.E.2d 1123 [2010];People v. Valencia, 3 N.Y.3d 714, 786 N.Y.S.2d 374, 819 N.E.2d 990 [2004];People v. Redwood, 41 A.D.3d 275, 838 N.Y.S.2d 66 [1st Dept. 2007], lv. denied9 N.Y.3d 880, 842 N.Y.S.2d 792, 874 N.E.2d 759 [2007] ). Accordingly, the court properly found that defendant had violated his plea agreement by absconding from the program and had thus forfeited the opportunity for a more lenient disposition.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Stephens

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2013
108 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James STEPHENS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 2, 2013

Citations

108 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
108 A.D.3d 414
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4985

Citing Cases

People v. Vargas

Defendant also failed to preserve his argument that the court should have held a hearing as to his compliance…

People v. Spruill

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Curtis J. Farber, J.), rendered October 16, 2018, convicting…