Opinion
November 6, 1995
Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant explicitly admitted the amount of the victims' monetary loss. Under these circumstances, there was no need for the court to conduct a hearing with respect to the proper amount of restitution (see, People v Kade, 153 A.D.2d 907).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.