From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Staton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.).


Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on the defendant's speedy trial motion to dismiss Indictment No. 3032/90, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court is to file its report with all convenient speed.

We find that the Supreme Court should have conducted a hearing to resolve the factual issues raised by the defendant's motion to dismiss for a violation of CPL 30.30 (1) (see, People v Robinson, 209 A.D.2d 649 [decided herewith]). The People did not submit documentary proof to support the contentions that certain time periods were excludable (CPL 210.45). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Lawrence and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Staton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Staton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEREK STATON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

People v. Vavel

The Supreme Court is to file its report with all convenient speed. The defendant, in this case, stands in the…