From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Staten-Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Jan 4, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2015-2163 K CR

01-04-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bryan STATEN-JACKSON, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Bryan D. Kreykes of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.


Appellate Advocates (Bryan D. Kreykes of counsel), for appellant.

Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Staten-Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Jan 4, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Staten-Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bryan STATEN-JACKSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Date published: Jan 4, 2019

Citations

62 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
112 N.Y.S.3d 857