5-101, C.R.S., in the same manner as the custodian. See, e.g., People v. Starcher, 107 P.3d 1127, 1128 (Colo.App. 2004); People v. Santisteven, 868 P.2d 415, 418 (Colo.App. 1993). Indeed, when Mr. Martinez-Bey sought habeas relief in the Colorado courts, they rejected his assertion that the custodian's application of the statute was incorrect.
Courts read and consider the statutory scheme scheme as a whole to give a consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to all its parts. People V. Starcher, 107 P.3d 1127 (Colo.App. 2004).