From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stancu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1984
106 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 24, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

While the testimony of defendant and the complainant conflicted on the issue of forcible compulsion, as a matter of law it cannot be said that the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally insufficient ( People v. Walstatter, 53 N.Y.2d 871; People v. Stoesser, 92 A.D.2d 650).

We have reviewed defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. O'Connor, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Stancu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1984
106 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Stancu

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIMITRU STANCU, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Porrata

Judgment affirmed. Although the testimony of the complainant and the defendant was in sharp conflict on the…