Opinion
Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CC506621
OPINION
Bamattre-Manoukian, ACTING P.J.
On February 24, 2006, an information was filed by the Santa Clara District Attorney alleging that defendant Robert Clifton Stancil resisted, delayed, and obstructed a peace officer in the discharge of his duties, a misdemeanor (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)) and drove and took a vehicle, a felony (Veh. Code, § 10851. subd. (a)). Defendant waived his right to a preliminary examination and pleaded no contest on April 24, 2006, to resisting, delaying and obstructing an officer in the performance of his duties, a misdemeanor (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)), and unauthorized use or theft of a vehicle, a felony (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)). Defendant was placed on formal probation for three years on condition that he serve the stipulated term of 90 days in jail with credit for 12 days, along with additional terms and conditions. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal and we appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court.
There are no facts contained in the probation report and the defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing.
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case, indicates that no details of the incident are contained in the probation report, and raises no specific issues on appeal. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and we have not received any written argument from defendant.
Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and People v. Kelley (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR: MIHARA, J., DUFFY, J.