From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stamps

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 2002
296 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1557

July 2, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J. Bonnie Wittner, J. and Renee White, J. at pretrial proceedings; William Leibovitz, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered May 25, 2000, convicting defendant of grand larceny in the fourth degree and bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

BETH BELLER, for respondent.

MARY A. NATION PRO SE, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Upon review of the record, we find that defendant had counsel at the pretrial court appearances in question. Even if we were to accept defendant's claim that he was effectively without counsel at the time that a plea offer was conveyed by the People, we would find no basis for reversal since it is abundantly clear that defendant had no interest in plea negotiations at that stage or at any other stage of this case.

The thorough inquiry conducted before defendant was permitted to represent himself at trial established that he understood the risks of proceeding pro se and that his waiver of his right to counsel was knowing and voluntary (see, People v. Arroyo, 98 N.Y.2d 101, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1578; People v. Smith, 92 N.Y.2d 516, 520), particularly in light of defendant's extensive prior involvement with the criminal justice system, which featured a prior trial in which he had also represented himself. The court had no reason to doubt defendant's mental competence (see, People v. Morgan, 87 N.Y.2d 878), and the fact that he may have made meritless legal arguments and exhibited strange notions about criminal procedure does not establish that he was incompetent to stand trial or represent himself (see, People v. Schoolfield, 196 A.D.2d 111, 116-118, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 915).

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Stamps

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 2002
296 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Stamps

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JERRY STAMPS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 2, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

State v. Villanueva

Instead, defense counsel informed the court that while throughout the case defendant had understood the…

People v. Jackson

In each instance, the court properly determined, on the basis of its own observations of defendant and the…