From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spruell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2009
60 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2007-01078.

March 17, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), rendered January 4, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Warren S. Landau of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Linda Breen of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.

Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci and Covello, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The sentencing court conducted a sufficient inquiry to determine that the defendant violated a condition of the plea agreement which the court had imposed as a prerequisite to youthful offender status ( see People v Valencia, 3 NY3d 714; People v Covington, 28 AD3d 575), and the court did not otherwise improvidently exercise its discretion in denying such status ( see People v Stanley, 38 AD3d 923; People v Taylor, 302 AD2d 480).


Summaries of

People v. Spruell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2009
60 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Spruell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GREGORY SPRUELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2006
874 N.Y.S.2d 383

Citing Cases

People v. Spruell

June 10, 2009. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 60 AD3d 876 (Kings). Smith,…

People v. Serrano

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentencing court conducted…