From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sprauve

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 22, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2015-07768

03-22-2017

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Peter Sprauve, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anders Nelson of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Joseph N. Ferdenzi, and Aurora Alvarez-Calderon of counsel), for respondent.


SANDRA L. SGROI SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ. (Ind. No. 2337/14)

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anders Nelson of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Joseph N. Ferdenzi, and Aurora Alvarez-Calderon of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered July 22, 2015, convicting him of tampering with physical evidence, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

DILLON, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

People v. Sprauve

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 22, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Sprauve

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Peter Sprauve…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 22, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)