From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sprague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2004
13 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

KA 02-00619.

December 30, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Frederic T. Henry, Jr., J.), rendered December 12, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of felony driving while intoxicated and driving while ability impaired.

Before: Pine, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of, inter alia, driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192; § 1193 [1] [c] [ii]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was denied a fair trial because County Court sustained certain objections made by the prosecutor during cross-examination of a witness for the prosecution ( see CPL 470.05; People v. George, 67 NY2d 817, 818-819). In any event, defendant's contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Sprague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2004
13 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Sprague

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARNOLD P. SPRAGUE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 755

Citing Cases

Rawson v. Beach

ASSUMPSIT. Heard by the court on an agreed statement of facts. Irving Champlin Nelson E. Church, for the…

Montgomery Ward Co. v. Newman

This being so, a parol acceptance by defendant was sufficient to bind him. In re Estate of Goddard, 66 Vt.…