From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spitzer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1944
60 N.E.2d 18 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued November 21, 1944

Decided December 30, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, DOWNS, J.

Jacob W. Friedman for appellant.

Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney ( Henry W. Schober of counsel), for respondent.


Defendant was indicted for and convicted of the crimes of burglary in the third degree, committed as a second offense, and petit larceny. The court clearly and forcibly indicated in his main charge and also in a charge made in response to a request that he believed the defendant guilty of the crimes for which he was indicted and that he should be convicted. This left for the jury no fair opportunity for consideration of the question of criminal intent which was an essential element of the crimes charged and the main point in issue in the case.

For the errors thus committed, and preserved for consideration by exceptions, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ., concur; LEWIS, J., taking no part.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Spitzer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1944
60 N.E.2d 18 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

People v. Spitzer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IRVING SPITZER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1944

Citations

60 N.E.2d 18 (N.Y. 1944)
60 N.E.2d 18