From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spinks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 30, 1996.

Case held, decision reserved, motion to relieve counsel of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


It is a denial of a defendant's constitutional right to effective assistance of appellate counsel for his lawyer to submit a brief requesting to be relieved of his assignment ( see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38) where there are nonfrivolous arguments for reversal or modification of defendant's conviction ( see, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606, 610). Our review of the record reveals several nonfrivolous issues, viz., that the evidence is insufficient to establish that the complainant suffered "physical injury" or to show that defendant intended to prevent complainant from performing a lawful duty, and tha t County Court erred in instructing the jury on justification. Consequently, we relieve counsel of his assignment and assign new counsel to brief those issues, as well as any other issues that counsel's review of the record may disclose ( see, People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906; People v Lake, 172 AD2d 1051, 1052). (Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Punch, J."Assault, 2nd Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Spinks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Spinks

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEMETRIOUS SPINKS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 823

Citing Cases

People v. Rhodes

Upon this appeal, defendant is again represented by the Public Defender's office which asserts that since…