From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spillman

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.
Oct 30, 2003
B162010 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2003)

Opinion

B162010.

10-30-2003

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HUBERT LEE SPILLMAN, Defendant and Appellant.


THE COURT:

Hubert Lee Spillman appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of possession of cocaine for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5.) The trial court found that appellant had suffered a prior felony within the meaning of Penal Code sections 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d) and 667, subdivisions (b) through (i). He was sentenced to eight years in state prison. We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal.

After examination of the record, counsel filed an "Opening Brief" in which no issues were raised. On February 28, 2003, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. On April 1, 2003, appellant submitted a letter which fails to raise any issues cognizable on appeal.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed. --------------- Notes: NOTT, Acting P.J., DOI TODD, J., and ASHMANN-GERST, J.


Summaries of

People v. Spillman

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.
Oct 30, 2003
B162010 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2003)
Case details for

People v. Spillman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HUBERT LEE SPILLMAN, Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

Date published: Oct 30, 2003

Citations

B162010 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2003)