Opinion
December 28, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarese, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial because the testimony of the police witnesses bolstered the complainant's identification testimony in violation of People v Trowbridge ( 305 N.Y. 471). Since the defense counsel did not object to the challenged testimony, the claimed error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v McGill, 183 A.D.2d 730; People v Foster, 182 A.D.2d 636), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Bracken and Lawrence, JJ., concur.