From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spalding

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 21, 2014
121 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

10-21-2014

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shana SPALDING, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Denise Fabiano of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Denise Fabiano of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered February 1, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of 10 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the second-degree robbery conviction to 7 years, resulting in a new aggregate term of 7 years, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to sever the counts relating to the two incidents. There was no basis for a severance, because the counts were properly joined as a matter of law pursuant to CPL 200.20(2)(b), in that evidence of each crime was admissible as to the other. While not identical, the two crimes were highly similar and involved a distinctive modus operandi (see e.g. People v. Robinson, 300 A.D.2d 65, 750 N.Y.S.2d 748 [1st Dept.2002], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 619, 757 N.Y.S.2d 830, 787 N.E.2d 1176 [2003] ). Additionally, the evidence establishing the two incidents overlapped for reasons independent of modus operandi. When defendant was arrested for the second crime, the police recovered items that circumstantially linked her to the first crime. Furthermore, defendant made interrelated confessions to the two crimes.

In any event, the counts were also properly joined as legally similar pursuant to CPL 200.20(2)(c), and defendant failed to make a sufficient showing to warrant a discretionary severance under CPL 200.20(3).

TOM, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Spalding

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 21, 2014
121 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Spalding

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shana SPALDING…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 21, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7094
993 N.Y.S.2d 894

Citing Cases

People v. Spalding

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 121 AD3d 536 (NY)…