From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 1989
146 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 17, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 1989
146 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JIMMY SOTO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice,…

People v. Whipple

We agree with the defendant that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court committed reversible…