From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 31, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Hickman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Mangano, J.P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCISCO SOTO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)