Opinion
February 9, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Alderberg, J.).
Defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied after defendant was afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard. In light of defendant's unsubstantiated claims of innocence, the sentencing court's inquiry was sufficient (see, People v. Mims, 216 A.D.2d 104, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 783). Further, as the record clearly indicates no basis for allowing withdrawal of the plea, defense counsel's decision riot to join in defendant's pro se motion did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Kelly, 232 A.D.2d 314), nor was appointment of new counsel required by defense counsel's refusal to adopt defendant's motion (People v. Simpson, 238 A.D.2d 193). A fair reading of the record fails to support defendant's claim that his counsel took a position adverse to defendant on the plea withdrawal motion.
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.