From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sorodsky

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jul 3, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 78866 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05452 M158833

07-03-2013

People of State of New York, respondent, v. Michail Sorodsky, appellant.


, J.P.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

LEONARD B. AUSTIN

SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 17, 2013, as a poor person, and for leave to proceed pro se.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Correction Law 168-n (3), his status as a poor person continues on appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any hearing held in connection with the order dated April 24, 2013, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,

ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall file one certified transcript of each of the proceedings with the Clerk of this Court, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); the Clerk of this Court shall deliver those transcripts to the person in charge of the institution wherein the appellant is incarcerated for examination by the appellant; the transcripts shall be returned to this Court when the appellant files the brief; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide the Clerk of this Court with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with or considered by the trial court in connection with the appellant's risk level determination, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; upon request, the Clerk of this Court shall deliver the presentence report to the person in charge of the institution wherein the appellant is incarcerated for examination by the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; the appellant shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing the appellant access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1102[d]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken and upon the Department of Probation; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to proceed pro se is granted on condition that at the time the appellant serves and files his brief he files a waiver of his right to appellate counsel in the form set forth below, acknowledged before a notary public:

WAIVER OF RIGHT TO APPELLATE COUNSEL I, Michail Sorodsky, understand that I have the right to be represented by an attorney in prosecuting my appeal. If I cannot afford to retain counsel, one will be assigned to represent me at State expense. I understand that if I elect to waive my right to counsel and I am incarcerated at the time my appeal is heard, the Court will not permit me to present oral argument. Knowing these rights I voluntarily elect to waive them and to represent myself on the appeal. I have not been forced to waive my rights and I believe myself to be of sufficient intelligence and ability to properly protect my own interests without the assistance of a lawyer to, among of things, write an appellate brief.

Michail Sorodsky

State of

County of

On the day of in the year before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Michail Sorodsky, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual executed the instrument.

Notary Public SKELOS, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

People v. Sorodsky

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jul 3, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 78866 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Sorodsky

Case Details

Full title:People of State of New York, respondent, v. Michail Sorodsky, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 78866 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)