From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Solizgalvez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2018
159 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–11224 Ind. No. 2323/15

03-14-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Orlen SOLIZGALVEZ, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Timothy Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, SHERI S. ROMAN, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (John B. Collins, J.), rendered September 8, 2016, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Little, 127 A.D.3d 1235, 1235–1236, 5 N.Y.S.3d 896 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 141, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Solizgalvez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2018
159 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Solizgalvez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Orlen SOLIZGALVEZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 14, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
159 A.D.3d 838

Citing Cases

People v. Solomon

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid…