Opinion
E043927
4-18-2008
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. OSCAR SOLIS, Defendant and Appellant.
Dennis Cava, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
On June 3, 2003, the District Attorney of San Bernardino County filed a felony complaint in case No. FNE003758, which charged defendant with transportation of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11379, subdivision (a) (count 1); possession for sale of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11378 (count 2); and false compartment activity in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11366.8, subdivision (a) (count 3).
On March 16, 2004, pursuant to Penal Code section 859a, defendant, represented by counsel, pled nolo contendere to possession for sale of a controlled substance, as charged in count two of the felony complaint. In accordance with the negotiated disposition, defendant was granted probation for three years on the condition he serve 90 days in the local jail, and counts one and three were dismissed on motion of the district attorney and in the interests of justice pursuant to Penal Code section 1385.
Thereafter, on July 30, 2007, in exchange for admitting a violation of probation committed in Los Angeles County, defendant agreed to a state prison sentence of 16 months to run concurrent to any other case. Defendant was awarded the appropriate custody credits.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Case No. FNE003758
On May 30, 2003, defendant and two others were arrested after their vehicle was stopped by officers of the California Highway Patrol and more than 900 grams of methamphetamine was discovered in a secret battery compartment under the hood.
2. Probation Officers Supplemental Report dated July 30, 2007
Defendant admitted that he violated his grant of probation. Defendant informed his probation officer that he did not report to the probation department because he was deported. He also stated that when he return to the United States he was arrested in Los Angeles County in case No. NA069764.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v.Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v.California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur:
HOLLENHORST, J.
GAUT, J. --------------- Notes: The statement of facts is taken from the San Bernardino County Probation Officers report dated April 15, 2004.