Opinion
October 23, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record amply supports the Supreme Court's determination that the pretrial lineup identification procedure was proper and not unduly suggestive. Further, any in-court identification of the defendant had a sufficient independent basis (see, People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759; People v Nurse, 142 A.D.2d 738; People v Smalls, 115 A.D.2d 783).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.